HackWorld: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents on Exploiting Web Application Vulnerabilities
Xiaoxue Ren , Penghao Jiang , Kaixin Li , Zhiyong Huang , Xiaoning Du , Jiaojiao Jiang , Zhenchang Xing , Jiamou Sun , Terry Yue Zhuo
- 🏛 Institutions
- ZJU , University of New South Wales , NUS , Monash University , CSIRO’s Data61 , Australian National University
- 📅 Date
- October 14, 2025
- 📑 Publisher
- ICLR 2026 (Poster)
- 💻 Env
- Web
- 🔑 Keywords
TLDR
HackWorld uses a CTF-style setup over 36 vulnerable web applications spanning 11 frameworks and 7 languages to test whether computer-use agents can discover and exploit realistic web flaws through GUI interaction. Current agents achieve exploitation rates below 12% and often fail at multi-step attack planning and security-tool use.
Related papers (24)
- SkillLifeBench: Benchmarking Security Across the Lifecycle of Agent SkillsOctober 26, 2026 · arXiv
- BrowseSafe++: Benchmarking Prompt Injection Detection Across Web Contexts, Languages, and Browser ViewsOctober 12, 2026 · arXiv
- Securing Computer-Use Agents Against Branch Steering AttacksOctober 2, 2026 · NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Agents in the Wild
- WebSP-Eval: Evaluating Web Agents on Website Security and Privacy TasksApril 7, 2026 · arXiv
- Next-Gen CAPTCHAs: Leveraging the Cognitive Gap for Scalable and Diverse GUI-Agent DefenseFebruary 9, 2026 · ICML 2026
- RedTeamCUA: Realistic Adversarial Testing of Computer-Use Agents in Hybrid Web-OS EnvironmentsMay 28, 2025 · ICLR 2026 (Oral)
- WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection AttacksApril 22, 2025 · NeurIPS 2025 (Poster)
- MobileJailBench: Red Queen Jailbreak Benchmarking for Mobile AgentsOctober 16, 2026 · arXiv
- MobileInject: Evaluating Reasoning-to-Action Security of MLLM-Based Mobile Agents under Cross-Modal Consistency InjectionOctober 16, 2026 · arXiv
- MMA-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Agent Safety EvaluationOctober 14, 2026 · arXiv
- MATE: Policy-Aware Security Auditing for Mobile Agents via Synthesis-Driven Trajectory LearningSeptember 19, 2026 · USENIX Security 2026
- Are Android GUI Agents Robust Against Runtime Anomalies? AnTrap: Evaluating Agents in Dynamic Adversarial EnvironmentsAugust 25, 2026 · arXiv
- The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use AgentsApril 12, 2026 · arXiv
- VPI-Bench: Visual Prompt Injection Attacks for Computer-Use AgentsJune 3, 2025 · ICLR 2026 (Poster)
- AgentHeal: Evaluating Goal-Preserving Resource Recovery of Web Agents under Access BarriersOctober 29, 2026 · arXiv
- AgentProofBench: Benchmarking Reusable Verifiers for Web AgentsOctober 25, 2026 · arXiv
- SkillShift-Bench: Benchmarking Skill Learning under Environment Evolution for Web AgentsOctober 24, 2026 · arXiv
- LoWAgent: A Low-Resource Multilingual Benchmark for Web AgentsOctober 19, 2026 · arXiv
- SPIDES: Information-Flow Control for Browser AgentsOctober 16, 2026 · arXiv
- What It Is, Not What It Says: Securing Agentic Browsing Interactions with Web SemanticsOctober 15, 2026 · arXiv
- Towards Safe Autonomy for Computer UseOctober 13, 2026 · arXiv
- PrivacyGuard: Source-Linked Sanitization and Locally Resolvable PII References for Cloud GUI AgentsOctober 12, 2026 · arXiv
- The Agent Clicks Approve: Injected Page Text Makes Browser Agents Authorize Access the Task Never NamedOctober 10, 2026 · arXiv
- When Charts Deceive Web Agents: A Paired Benchmark for Misleading Visualization-Grounded TasksOctober 9, 2026 · arXiv