The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use Agents
Xuwei Ding , Skylar Zhai , Linxin Song , Jiate Li , Taiwei Shi , Nicholas Meade , Siva Reddy , Jian Kang , Jieyu Zhao
- 🏛 Institutions
- USC , McGill , Mila
- 📅 Date
- April 12, 2026
- 📑 Publisher
- arXiv
- 💻 Env
- Desktop
- 🔑 Keywords
TLDR
OS-BLIND benchmarks computer-use agents under unintended attack scenarios where benign instructions trigger harmful outcomes through environmental context. Most agents exceed 90% attack success rate, and even safety-aligned Claude 4.5 Sonnet reaches 73%. Existing safety defenses activate only initially and fail to re-engage during execution, especially when subtask decomposition obscures harmful intent.
Related papers (24)
- Are Android GUI Agents Robust Against Runtime Anomalies? AnTrap: Evaluating Agents in Dynamic Adversarial EnvironmentsAugust 25, 2026 · arXiv
- AgentHijack: Visual Patch Attacks on Multimodal Computer-Use AgentsSeptember 6, 2026 · arXiv
- SIR: Self-improving Red-teaming for Compute Use AgentsAugust 31, 2026 · arXiv
- ADeptS-Bench: Measuring the Trustworthiness of Computer Use Agents Across DevicesAugust 25, 2026 · arXiv
- Preference Redirection via Attention Concentration: An Attack on Computer Use AgentsApril 9, 2026 · arXiv
- When Benign Inputs Lead to Severe Harms: Eliciting Unsafe Unintended Behaviors of Computer-Use AgentsFebruary 9, 2026 · arXiv
- When Actions Go Off-Task: Detecting and Correcting Misaligned Actions in Computer-Use AgentsFebruary 9, 2026 · arXiv
- macOSWorld: A Multilingual Interactive Benchmark for GUI AgentsJune 4, 2025 · NeurIPS 2025 (Poster)
- VPI-Bench: Visual Prompt Injection Attacks for Computer-Use AgentsJune 3, 2025 · ICLR 2026 (Poster)
- RiOSWorld: Benchmarking the Risk of Multimodal Computer-Use AgentsMay 31, 2025 · NeurIPS 2025 (Poster)
- RedTeamCUA: Realistic Adversarial Testing of Computer-Use Agents in Hybrid Web-OS EnvironmentsMay 28, 2025 · ICLR 2026 (Oral)
- WiP: Characterizing and Defending Against Mobile-Agent-Driven MFA AutomationSeptember 2, 2026 · arXiv
- Beyond the Verdict: Evidence-Aligned Evaluation of Visual Prompt-Injection GuardrailsSeptember 2, 2026 · arXiv
- WebMCP-Phalanx: Enforcing and Characterizing Trust Boundaries for Browser-Integrated LLM AgentsAugust 25, 2026 · arXiv
- MobileWorldSafety: Benchmarking GUI Agent Safety Against Environmental Injection Attacks in Android AppsAugust 18, 2026 · arXiv
- StepJack: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agent Safety Against Multi-Step Indirect Prompt InjectionAugust 6, 2026 · arXiv
- CORA: Conformal Risk-Controlled Agents for Safeguarded Mobile GUI AutomationApril 10, 2026 · arXiv
- WebSP-Eval: Evaluating Web Agents on Website Security and Privacy TasksApril 7, 2026 · arXiv
- Dual-Modality Multi-Stage Adversarial Safety Training: Robustifying Multimodal Web Agents Against Cross-Modal AttacksMarch 4, 2026 · arXiv
- LPS-Bench: Benchmarking Safety Awareness of Computer-Use Agents in Long-Horizon Planning under Benign and Adversarial ScenariosFebruary 3, 2026 · arXiv
- WebTrap Park: An Automated Platform for Systematic Security Evaluation of Web AgentsJanuary 13, 2026 · arXiv
- It's a TRAP! Task-Redirecting Agent Persuasion Benchmark for Web AgentsDecember 29, 2025 · arXiv
- DECEPTICON: How Dark Patterns Manipulate Web AgentsDecember 28, 2025 · arXiv
- Investigating the Impact of Dark Patterns on LLM-Based Web AgentsOctober 20, 2025 · IEEE S&P 2026