VPI-Bench: Visual Prompt Injection Attacks for Computer-Use Agents
Tri Cao , Bennett Lim , Yue Liu , Yuan Sui , Yuexin Li , Shumin Deng , Lin Lu , Nay Oo , Shuicheng Yan , Bryan Hooi
- 🏛 Institutions
- NUS , Cyber Emerging Tech and R&D
- 📅 Date
- June 3, 2025
- 📑 Publisher
- ICLR 2026 (Poster)
- 💻 Env
- Desktop
- 🔑 Keywords
TLDR
VPI-Bench studies visual prompt injection attacks on computer-use agents, where malicious instructions are embedded directly into rendered user interfaces rather than hidden in HTML. Across 306 cases on five platforms, it shows that both full-system-access CUAs and browser-use agents remain highly vulnerable, and that prompt-only defenses offer limited protection.
Related papers (24)
- The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use AgentsApril 12, 2026 · arXiv
- Preference Redirection via Attention Concentration: An Attack on Computer Use AgentsApril 9, 2026 · arXiv
- RedTeamCUA: Realistic Adversarial Testing of Computer-Use Agents in Hybrid Web-OS EnvironmentsMay 28, 2025 · ICLR 2026 (Oral)
- SkillLifeBench: Benchmarking Security Across the Lifecycle of Agent SkillsOctober 26, 2026 · arXiv
- MobileJailBench: Red Queen Jailbreak Benchmarking for Mobile AgentsOctober 16, 2026 · arXiv
- MobileInject: Evaluating Reasoning-to-Action Security of MLLM-Based Mobile Agents under Cross-Modal Consistency InjectionOctober 16, 2026 · arXiv
- MMA-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Agent Safety EvaluationOctober 14, 2026 · arXiv
- BrowseSafe++: Benchmarking Prompt Injection Detection Across Web Contexts, Languages, and Browser ViewsOctober 12, 2026 · arXiv
- Securing Computer-Use Agents Against Branch Steering AttacksOctober 2, 2026 · NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Agents in the Wild
- AgentBreaker: Evaluating Context-Aware Indirect Prompt Injection Risks in Modern Web AgentsOctober 1, 2026 · ISSTA 2026
- MATE: Policy-Aware Security Auditing for Mobile Agents via Synthesis-Driven Trajectory LearningSeptember 19, 2026 · USENIX Security 2026
- Are Android GUI Agents Robust Against Runtime Anomalies? AnTrap: Evaluating Agents in Dynamic Adversarial EnvironmentsAugust 25, 2026 · arXiv
- WebSP-Eval: Evaluating Web Agents on Website Security and Privacy TasksApril 7, 2026 · arXiv
- Next-Gen CAPTCHAs: Leveraging the Cognitive Gap for Scalable and Diverse GUI-Agent DefenseFebruary 9, 2026 · ICML 2026
- Zero-Permission Manipulation: Can We Trust Large Multimodal Model Powered GUI Agents?January 18, 2026 · arXiv
- HackWorld: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents on Exploiting Web Application VulnerabilitiesOctober 14, 2025 · ICLR 2026 (Poster)
- WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection AttacksApril 22, 2025 · NeurIPS 2025 (Poster)
- Dissecting Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal LM AgentsJune 18, 2024 · ICLR 2025 (Poster)
- CUA-Recovery: Benchmarking Error Recovery in Long-Horizon Computer-Use AgentsOctober 20, 2026 · arXiv
- CUA-Lite: An Open Platform for Computer Use AgentsOctober 19, 2026 · arXiv
- PersonaCUABench: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agents Serving Diverse PersonasOctober 16, 2026 · arXiv
- MAI-Gym: An Open All-in-One Platform for GUI Agent Evaluation and RL Training across Mobile and Computer EnvironmentsOctober 14, 2026 · arXiv
- Towards Safe Autonomy for Computer UseOctober 13, 2026 · arXiv
- PrivacyGuard: Source-Linked Sanitization and Locally Resolvable PII References for Cloud GUI AgentsOctober 12, 2026 · arXiv