Mobile GUI Agents under Real-world Threats: Are We There Yet?
Guohong Liu , Jialei Ye , Jiacheng Liu , Wei Liu , Pengzhi Gao , Jian Luan , Yuanchun Li , Yunxin Liu
- 🏛 Institutions
- AIR, Tsinghua , University of Electronic Science and Technology of China , PKU , MiLM Plus , Xiaomi
- 📅 Date
- July 6, 2025
- 📑 Publisher
- MobiSys 2026
- 💻 Env
- Mobile
- 🔑 Keywords
TLDR
AgentHazard evaluates mobile GUI agents when untrusted third-party content appears inside otherwise legitimate app regions, a threat missing from standard static-content benchmarks. Its instrumentation framework supports a dynamic environment with 122 tasks and a static dataset with more than 3,000 scenarios; evaluated agents show average misleading rates of 42.0% and 36.1% in the two settings.
Related papers (24)
- WiP: Characterizing and Defending Against Mobile-Agent-Driven MFA AutomationSeptember 2, 2026 · arXiv
- Are Android GUI Agents Robust Against Runtime Anomalies? AnTrap: Evaluating Agents in Dynamic Adversarial EnvironmentsAugust 25, 2026 · arXiv
- MobileWorldSafety: Benchmarking GUI Agent Safety Against Environmental Injection Attacks in Android AppsAugust 18, 2026 · arXiv
- AgentHijack: Visual Patch Attacks on Multimodal Computer-Use AgentsSeptember 6, 2026 · arXiv
- Beyond the Verdict: Evidence-Aligned Evaluation of Visual Prompt-Injection GuardrailsSeptember 2, 2026 · arXiv
- SIR: Self-improving Red-teaming for Compute Use AgentsAugust 31, 2026 · arXiv
- WebMCP-Phalanx: Enforcing and Characterizing Trust Boundaries for Browser-Integrated LLM AgentsAugust 25, 2026 · arXiv
- The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use AgentsApril 12, 2026 · arXiv
- Preference Redirection via Attention Concentration: An Attack on Computer Use AgentsApril 9, 2026 · arXiv
- Dual-Modality Multi-Stage Adversarial Safety Training: Robustifying Multimodal Web Agents Against Cross-Modal AttacksMarch 4, 2026 · arXiv
- A Survey on the Safety and Security Threats of Computer-Using Agents: JARVIS or Ultron?May 16, 2025 · arXiv
- MIP against Agent: Malicious Image Patches Hijacking Multimodal OS AgentsMarch 13, 2025 · NeurIPS 2025 (Poster)
- ActReal: System-Level Mobile Agents Challenge Mobile Automation DetectionAugust 30, 2026 · arXiv
- ADeptS-Bench: Measuring the Trustworthiness of Computer Use Agents Across DevicesAugust 25, 2026 · arXiv
- SeerGuard: A Safety Framework for Mobile GUI Agents via World Model PredictionJuly 17, 2026 · arXiv
- CORA: Conformal Risk-Controlled Agents for Safeguarded Mobile GUI AutomationApril 10, 2026 · arXiv
- AgentRAE: Remote Action Execution through Notification-based Visual Backdoors against Screenshots-based Mobile GUI AgentsMarch 24, 2026 · arXiv
- Zero-Permission Manipulation: Can We Trust Large Multimodal Model Powered GUI Agents?January 18, 2026 · arXiv
- LLM-Powered GUI Agents in Phone Automation: Surveying Progress and ProspectsApril 28, 2025 · TMLR 2025
- On the Robustness of GUI Grounding Models Against Image AttacksApril 7, 2025 · arXiv
- VeriSafe Agent: Safeguarding Mobile GUI Agent via Logic-based Action VerificationMarch 24, 2025 · MobiCom 2025
- Evaluating the Robustness of Multimodal Agents Against Active Environmental Injection AttacksFebruary 18, 2025 · ACM MM 2025
- MobileSafetyBench: Evaluating Safety of Autonomous Agents in Mobile Device ControlOctober 23, 2024 · arXiv
- StepJack: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agent Safety Against Multi-Step Indirect Prompt InjectionAugust 6, 2026 · arXiv