MobileInject: Evaluating Reasoning-to-Action Security of MLLM-Based Mobile Agents under Cross-Modal Consistency Injection
Songping Wang , Peiyang Li , Yi Huang , Fengting Li , Xuhao Ran , Yueming Lyu , Chao Feng , Caifeng Shan
- 🏛 Institutions
- NJU , Ant Group , PKU
- 📅 Date
- October 16, 2026
- 📑 Publisher
- arXiv
- 💻 Env
- Mobile
- 🔑 Keywords
TLDR
Introduces MobileInject, a benchmark evaluating multimodal mobile agents against Cross-Modal Consistency Injection attacks across 11 scenarios and 9 security-risk categories to identify early-stage reasoning hijacking.
Related papers (24)
- MobileJailBench: Red Queen Jailbreak Benchmarking for Mobile AgentsOctober 16, 2026 · arXiv
- MMA-SafetyBench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Agent Safety EvaluationOctober 14, 2026 · arXiv
- BrowseSafe++: Benchmarking Prompt Injection Detection Across Web Contexts, Languages, and Browser ViewsOctober 12, 2026 · arXiv
- WASP: Benchmarking Web Agent Security Against Prompt Injection AttacksApril 22, 2025 · NeurIPS 2025 (Poster)
- iPrefBench: A User-Centric Benchmark for Personalized Mobile Use AgentsOctober 26, 2026 · arXiv
- AndroidFlux: Evaluating Failure Recovery and Recovery Action Reward Modeling in Mobile-Use Multimodal AgentsOctober 25, 2026 · arXiv
- Not All Graphs Are Maps: A Task-Agnostic Exploration Framework for Mobile GUI NavigationOctober 15, 2026 · arXiv
- How GUI Agents Fail: GraceBench for Execution Stability DiagnosisOctober 14, 2026 · arXiv
- OpenMobile-2: Building Versatile Mobile Agents with Scalable Environments and App-Native ToolsOctober 9, 2026 · arXiv
- MATE: Policy-Aware Security Auditing for Mobile Agents via Synthesis-Driven Trajectory LearningSeptember 19, 2026 · USENIX Security 2026
- Are Android GUI Agents Robust Against Runtime Anomalies? AnTrap: Evaluating Agents in Dynamic Adversarial EnvironmentsAugust 25, 2026 · arXiv
- MobileSafetyBench: Evaluating Safety of Autonomous Agents in Mobile Device ControlOctober 23, 2024 · arXiv
- SkillLifeBench: Benchmarking Security Across the Lifecycle of Agent SkillsOctober 26, 2026 · arXiv
- SPIDES: Information-Flow Control for Browser AgentsOctober 16, 2026 · arXiv
- What It Is, Not What It Says: Securing Agentic Browsing Interactions with Web SemanticsOctober 15, 2026 · arXiv
- AdvSim2Real : Training Web Agents Against Adaptive Prompt Injection in a Web World ModelOctober 6, 2026 · arXiv
- Securing Computer-Use Agents Against Branch Steering AttacksOctober 2, 2026 · NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Agents in the Wild
- The Verifiable Action Card: Trustworthy Human-in-the-Loop Control for Secure Autonomous AgentsSeptember 16, 2026 · arXiv
- AgentHijack: Visual Patch Attacks on Multimodal Computer-Use AgentsSeptember 6, 2026 · arXiv
- Beyond the Verdict: Evidence-Aligned Evaluation of Visual Prompt-Injection GuardrailsSeptember 2, 2026 · arXiv
- SIR: Self-improving Red-teaming for Compute Use AgentsAugust 31, 2026 · arXiv
- WebMCP-Phalanx: Enforcing and Characterizing Trust Boundaries for Browser-Integrated LLM AgentsAugust 25, 2026 · arXiv
- The Blind Spot of Agent Safety: How Benign User Instructions Expose Critical Vulnerabilities in Computer-Use AgentsApril 12, 2026 · arXiv
- WebSP-Eval: Evaluating Web Agents on Website Security and Privacy TasksApril 7, 2026 · arXiv